Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BITB vs BTCW: which tracked its coin?

Over the year, BITB finished 0.49 of a percentage point ahead of Bitcoin and BTCW 0.40 ahead.

Bitwise Bitcoin ETF and WisdomTree Bitcoin Fund, side by side, crypto ETFs on ETFIQ.

−32.7%BITB returned, year
−32.8%BTCW returned, year
+0.5 ptsBITB against Bitcoin, in percentage points
+0.4 ptsBTCW against Bitcoin, in percentage points

ETFIQ Coin Capture Score: BITB scores higher

How much of what holding the coin gave did a holder of the fund keep?

BITB 43.8BTCW 20.82.1, the lowest in this set97.9, the highest

A percentile among the 24 spot crypto ETPs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All crypto ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BITBWithin a point of Bitcoin · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
Bitcoin−33.17%BITB−32.68%about level with BitcoinTotal return, 1 year, fund against the coinBitcoin−33.17%BITB−32.68%about level with BitcoinTotal return, 1 year
BTCWWithin a point of Bitcoin · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
Bitcoin−33.17%BTCW−32.77%about level with BitcoinTotal return, 1 year, fund against the coinBitcoin−33.17%BTCW−32.77%about level with BitcoinTotal return, 1 year

The same coin, two trusts

BITB and BTCW hold the same asset. Both are 1933 Act trusts holding Bitcoin through a custodian, so neither has a portfolio to compare: the whole of each fund is one line. Over the same days, BITB finished 0.49 of a percentage point ahead of Bitcoin and BTCW 0.40 of a percentage point ahead, so BTCW kept more of what holding the coin gave, by 0.09 of a percentage point. That gap is the fee, the custody, the creation and redemption friction and the market’s pricing of the shares, compounded into one figure.

Performance, window by window

BITB and BTCW over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnThe coin over the same daysDifference, percentage points
BITBBTCWBITBBTCWBITBBTCW
1 month+22.0%+21.9%+21.8%+21.8%+0.2 pts+0.2 pts
3 months+21.5%+21.4%+21.5%+21.5%0.0 pts−0.2 pts
6 months+8.5%+8.3%+8.8%+8.8%−0.4 pts−0.5 pts
1 year−32.7%−32.8%−33.2%−33.2%+0.5 pts+0.4 pts
Since each listed+64.2%+65.4%+66.6%+66.6%−2.4 pts−1.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BITB and BTCW on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BITB
Bitwise Bitcoin ETF
Holds Bitcoin through a custodian, listed Jan 11, 2024
BTCW
WisdomTree Bitcoin Fund
Holds Bitcoin through a custodian, listed Jan 11, 2024
SponsorBitwiseWisdomTree
HoldsBitcoinBitcoin
Net assets$2.1bn, balance sheet of Jun 30, 2026not read
Sponsor’s fee0.20%0.25%
Fee waiverreduced to 0.20%, until July 10, 2024the whole fee
Stakingthe chain has nonethe chain has none
ListedJan 11, 2024Jan 11, 2024
Days since listing974 days974 days
Days it has traded669669
Days it closed unchanged22
Quotedon an exchange, every trading dayon an exchange, every trading day
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−32.7%−32.8%
The coin over the same days−33.2%−33.2%
Difference, percentage points+0.5 pts+0.4 pts
Fund returned since it listed+64.2%+65.4%
Difference since it listed−2.4 pts−1.2 pts
Price$41.94$81.6

BITB in plain words

BITB holds Bitcoin through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, Bitcoin moved −33.2% and BITB returned −32.7%. That leaves it 0.49 of a percentage point ahead. That difference is the fee, the custody cost, the friction of creating and redeeming shares in blocks, and whatever the market paid for the shares rather than for the coin, all of it together. It is the only figure on this page the sponsor does not publish itself. BITB charges 0.20% a year and still finished 0.5% ahead of Bitcoin, which a fee cannot do on its own. On a chain with nothing to stake, a fund cannot earn its way past the asset it holds: what moved is what the market paid for the shares. A spot trust is not a registered investment company. It files a 10-K rather than an N-PORT, and its holding is one line: the Bitcoin it custodies.

BTCW in plain words

BTCW holds Bitcoin through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, Bitcoin moved −33.2% and BTCW returned −32.8%. That leaves it 0.40 of a percentage point ahead. BTCW charges 0.25% a year and still finished 0.4% ahead of Bitcoin, which a fee cannot do on its own.

Questions people ask

Which tracked Bitcoin more closely, BITB or BTCW?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, BITB finished 0.49 of a percentage point ahead of Bitcoin and BTCW 0.40 of a percentage point ahead, so BTCW tracked it more closely, by 0.09 of a percentage point. That difference is the fee, the custody cost, the friction of creating and redeeming shares in blocks and whatever the market paid for the shares rather than for the coin, all together.
Do BITB or BTCW pay a staking yield?
Bitcoin is a proof of work chain, so there is nothing to stake and no fund holding it can pay a staking yield.
What is the difference between BITB and BTCW?
Both hold Bitcoin through a custodian and both trade on an exchange, so what separates them is what each costs a holder over time. BITB is sponsored by Bitwise and listed Jan 11, 2024; BTCW by WisdomTree, listed Jan 11, 2024.
Which is cheaper, BITB or BTCW?
BITB charges 0.20% a year and BTCW charges 0.25%, so BITB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BITB against BTCW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BITB against BTCW, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/BITB-BTCW Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources