Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BAVA vs GAVA: which tracked its coin?

Over the window both share, BAVA finished 0.94 of a percentage point ahead of Avalanche and GAVA 1.1 ahead.

Bitwise Avalanche ETF and Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF, side by side, crypto ETFs on ETFIQ.

−20.3%BAVA returned, time since it listed
−21.2%GAVA returned, time since it listed
+0.7 ptsBAVA against Avalanche, in percentage points
+1.6 ptsGAVA against Avalanche, in percentage points

ETFIQ Coin Capture Score: GAVA scores higher

How much of what holding the coin gave did a holder of the fund keep?

BAVA 55.4GAVA 69.61.8, the lowest in this set98.2, the highest

A percentile among the 28 spot crypto ETPs listed less than a year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All crypto ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BAVAWithin a point of Avalanche · since launch to Sep 11, 2026
Avalanche−20.97%BAVA−20.25%0.72 pts ahead of AvalancheTotal return, since launch, fund against the coinAvalanche−20.97%BAVA−20.25%0.72 pts aheadTotal return, since launch
GAVA1.6 pts from Avalanche · since launch to Sep 11, 2026
Avalanche−22.89%GAVA−21.24%1.65 pts ahead of AvalancheTotal return, since launch, fund against the coinAvalanche−22.89%GAVA−21.24%1.65 pts ahead of AvalancheTotal return, since launch

The same coin, two trusts

BAVA and GAVA hold the same asset. Both are 1933 Act trusts holding Avalanche through a custodian, so neither has a portfolio to compare: the whole of each fund is one line. Over the days each has traded, BAVA finished 0.72 of a percentage point ahead of Avalanche and GAVA 1.6 percentage points ahead, but the two windows are not the same days, so neither figure is set against the other here. That gap is the fee, the custody, the creation and redemption friction and the market’s pricing of the shares, compounded into one figure.

Performance, window by window

BAVA and GAVA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnThe coin over the same daysDifference, percentage points
BAVAGAVABAVAGAVABAVAGAVA
1 month+18.2%+18.2%+18.1%+18.1%+0.1 pts+0.1 pts
3 months+14.5%+14.6%+13.5%+13.5%+0.9 pts+1.1 pts
6 monthsnot published−22.6%not published−23.3%not published+0.7 pts
Since each listed−20.3%−21.2%−21.0%−22.9%+0.7 pts+1.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BAVA and GAVA on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BAVA
Bitwise Avalanche ETF
Holds Avalanche through a custodian, listed Apr 15, 2026
GAVA
Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF
Holds Avalanche through a custodian, listed Mar 12, 2026
SponsorBitwiseGrayscale
HoldsAvalancheAvalanche
Net assets$17m, balance sheet of Jun 30, 2026not read
Sponsor’s fee0.34%0.35%
Fee waiverthe whole fee, until May 14, 2026none
Stakingthe filings say it doesthe filings say it does
ListedApr 15, 2026Mar 12, 2026
Days since listing149 days183 days
Days it has traded104127
Days it closed unchanged00
Quotedon an exchange, every trading dayon an exchange, every trading day
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−20.3%−21.2%
The coin over the same days−21.0%−22.9%
Difference, percentage points+0.7 pts+1.6 pts
Fund returned since it listed−20.3%−21.2%
Difference since it listed+0.7 pts+1.6 pts
Price$20.2813$18.185

BAVA in plain words

BAVA holds Avalanche through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the time since it listed to Sep 11, 2026, Avalanche moved −21.0% and BAVA returned −20.3%. That leaves it 0.72 of a percentage point ahead. That difference is the fee, the custody cost, the friction of creating and redeeming shares in blocks, and whatever the market paid for the shares rather than for the coin, all of it together. It is the only figure on this page the sponsor does not publish itself. BAVA charges 0.34% a year and still finished 0.7% ahead of Avalanche, which a fee cannot do on its own. Avalanche is a proof of stake chain, so a fund holding it can stake. BAVA’s own filings say it does (10-Q, Aug 12, 2026). It charges 0.34% and finished only −0.7% behind Avalanche, so staking covered about 1.1% of that fee over these days. A spot trust is not a registered investment company. It files a 10-K rather than an N-PORT, and its holding is one line: the Avalanche it custodies.

GAVA in plain words

GAVA holds Avalanche through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the time since it listed to Sep 11, 2026, Avalanche moved −22.9% and GAVA returned −21.2%. That leaves it 1.6 percentage points ahead. GAVA charges 0.35% a year and still finished 1.6% ahead of Avalanche, which a fee cannot do on its own. GAVA’s own filings say it does (424B3, Aug 7, 2026). What the prices show is that it finished 1.6% ahead of Avalanche’s own price over the same days, against +2.9% for the other 2 funds holding Avalanche. After a fee, an in-kind ETP ahead of the asset it holds got there by staking.

Questions people ask

Which tracked Avalanche more closely, BAVA or GAVA?
Over the days each has traded, BAVA finished 0.72 of a percentage point ahead of Avalanche and GAVA 1.6 percentage points ahead. Those are not set against each other here, because the two windows are not the same days, so neither is nearer its coin than the other on this page. Each difference carries the fee, the custody cost, the friction of creating and redeeming shares in blocks and whatever the market paid for the shares rather than for the coin.
Do BAVA or GAVA pay a staking yield?
Avalanche is a proof of stake chain, so staking is possible. Whether either trust stakes, and what the sponsor keeps of it, is a term in its own filings and is read from those rather than assumed.
What is the difference between BAVA and GAVA?
Both hold Avalanche through a custodian and both trade on an exchange, so what separates them is what each costs a holder over time. BAVA is sponsored by Bitwise and listed Apr 15, 2026; GAVA by Grayscale, listed Mar 12, 2026.
Which is cheaper, BAVA or GAVA?
BAVA charges 0.34% a year and GAVA charges 0.35%, so BAVA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BAVA against GAVA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BAVA against GAVA, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/BAVA-GAVA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources