Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ARKB vs BRRR: which tracked its coin?

Over the year, ARKB finished 0.50 of a percentage point ahead of Bitcoin and BRRR 0.52 ahead.

Ark 21Shares Bitcoin ETF and CoinShares Bitcoin ETF, side by side, crypto ETFs on ETFIQ.

−32.7%ARKB returned, year
−32.6%BRRR returned, year
+0.5 ptsARKB against Bitcoin, in percentage points
+0.5 ptsBRRR against Bitcoin, in percentage points

ETFIQ Coin Capture Score: BRRR scores higher

How much of what holding the coin gave did a holder of the fund keep?

ARKB 47.9BRRR 54.22.1, the lowest in this set97.9, the highest

A percentile among the 24 spot crypto ETPs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All crypto ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ARKBWithin a point of Bitcoin · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
Bitcoin−33.17%ARKB−32.67%about level with BitcoinTotal return, 1 year, fund against the coinBitcoin−33.17%ARKB−32.67%about level with BitcoinTotal return, 1 year
BRRRWithin a point of Bitcoin · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
Bitcoin−33.17%BRRR−32.65%about level with BitcoinTotal return, 1 year, fund against the coinBitcoin−33.17%BRRR−32.65%about level with BitcoinTotal return, 1 year

The same coin, two trusts

ARKB and BRRR hold the same asset. Both are 1933 Act trusts holding Bitcoin through a custodian, so neither has a portfolio to compare: the whole of each fund is one line. Over the same days, ARKB finished 0.50 of a percentage point ahead of Bitcoin and BRRR 0.52 of a percentage point ahead, so ARKB kept more of what holding the coin gave, by 0.02 of a percentage point. That gap is the fee, the custody, the creation and redemption friction and the market’s pricing of the shares, compounded into one figure.

Performance, window by window

ARKB and BRRR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnThe coin over the same daysDifference, percentage points
ARKBBRRRARKBBRRRARKBBRRR
1 month+21.9%+22.0%+21.8%+21.8%+0.2 pts+0.2 pts
3 months+21.5%+21.5%+21.5%+21.5%0.0 pts0.0 pts
6 months+8.5%+8.5%+8.8%+8.8%−0.4 pts−0.4 pts
1 year−32.7%−32.6%−33.2%−33.2%+0.5 pts+0.5 pts
Since each listed+64.4%+63.9%+66.6%+66.6%−2.2 pts−1.6% of its growth
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ARKB and BRRR on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ARKB
Ark 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
Holds Bitcoin through a custodian, listed Jan 11, 2024
BRRR
CoinShares Bitcoin ETF
Holds Bitcoin through a custodian, listed Jan 11, 2024
SponsorArkCoinShares
HoldsBitcoinBitcoin
Net assets$1.9bn, balance sheet of Jun 30, 2026$342m, balance sheet of Jun 30, 2026
Sponsor’s fee0.21%0.25%
Fee waiverthe whole feethe whole fee
Stakingthe chain has nonethe chain has none
ListedJan 11, 2024Jan 11, 2024
Days since listing974 days974 days
Days it has traded669669
Days it closed unchanged37
Quotedon an exchange, every trading dayon an exchange, every trading day
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−32.7%−32.6%
The coin over the same days−33.2%−33.2%
Difference, percentage points+0.5 pts+0.5 pts
Fund returned since it listed+64.4%+63.9%
Difference since it listed−2.2 pts−1.6% of its growth
Price$25.62$21.7873

ARKB in plain words

ARKB holds Bitcoin through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, Bitcoin moved −33.2% and ARKB returned −32.7%. That leaves it 0.50 of a percentage point ahead. That difference is the fee, the custody cost, the friction of creating and redeeming shares in blocks, and whatever the market paid for the shares rather than for the coin, all of it together. It is the only figure on this page the sponsor does not publish itself. ARKB charges 0.21% a year and still finished 0.5% ahead of Bitcoin, which a fee cannot do on its own. On a chain with nothing to stake, a fund cannot earn its way past the asset it holds: what moved is what the market paid for the shares. A spot trust is not a registered investment company. It files a 10-K rather than an N-PORT, and its holding is one line: the Bitcoin it custodies.

BRRR in plain words

BRRR holds Bitcoin through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, Bitcoin moved −33.2% and BRRR returned −32.6%. That leaves it 0.52 of a percentage point ahead. BRRR charges 0.25% a year and still finished 0.5% ahead of Bitcoin, which a fee cannot do on its own.

Questions people ask

Which tracked Bitcoin more closely, ARKB or BRRR?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, ARKB finished 0.50 of a percentage point ahead of Bitcoin and BRRR 0.52 of a percentage point ahead, so ARKB tracked it more closely, by 0.02 of a percentage point. That difference is the fee, the custody cost, the friction of creating and redeeming shares in blocks and whatever the market paid for the shares rather than for the coin, all together.
Do ARKB or BRRR pay a staking yield?
Bitcoin is a proof of work chain, so there is nothing to stake and no fund holding it can pay a staking yield.
What is the difference between ARKB and BRRR?
Both hold Bitcoin through a custodian and both trade on an exchange, so what separates them is what each costs a holder over time. ARKB is sponsored by Ark and listed Jan 11, 2024; BRRR by CoinShares, listed Jan 11, 2024.
Which is cheaper, ARKB or BRRR?
ARKB charges 0.21% a year and BRRR charges 0.25%, so ARKB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ARKB against BRRR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ARKB against BRRR, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/ARKB-BRRR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources