Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DDFF vs FEBT: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 FEBT can fall 8.9% before its buffer engages and DDFF 6.1%, and FEBT resets 1 days sooner.

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - Feb and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 ETF - Feb.

6.1%DDFF can fall this far before its buffer
8.9%FEBT can fall this far before its buffer
2.7%DDFF can still gain
5.3%FEBT can still gain
DDFFAt its cap
15 pts of buffer+9.3% gain captured−15.0% floor0% period start+9.3% capTODAY · SPY +11.8%15 pts+9.3%−15.0% floor0% start+9.3% capTODAY · SPY +11.8%
FEBTBetween buffer and cap
10 pts of buffer+11.8% gain captured−10.0% floor0% period start+15.5% capTODAY · SPY +11.8%10 pts+11.8%−10.0% floor0% start+15.5% capTODAY · SPY +11.8%

These are two different products. FEBT is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DDFF is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

FEBT resets first, on Jan 31, 2027, 131 days from now; DDFF runs to Jan 31, 2027, 132 days. DDFF can still gain 2.7% before its cap, FEBT 5.3%. A fall from here reaches DDFF’s buffer after 6.1% and FEBT’s after 8.9%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

DDFF and FEBT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
DDFFFEBTDDFFFEBT
3 months+1.8%+2.5%−0.5 pts+0.3 pts
6 months+7.6%+12.7%−10.5 pts−5.3 pts
1 yearnot published+14.2%not published−2.3 pts
3 yearsnot published+56.1%not published−22.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DDFF and FEBT on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DDFF
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - Feb
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 9.3%, over a period ending Jan 31, 2027
FEBT
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 ETF - Feb
Absorbs the first 10% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 15.5%, over a period ending Jan 31, 2027
IssuerInnovatorAllianzIM
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer15%10%
Outcome periodJan 31, 2026 to Jan 31, 2027Feb 1, 2026 to Jan 31, 2027
Days left132131
Starting cap+9.3%+15.5%
Can still gain2.7%5.3%
Fall before buffer6.1%8.9%
Protection left, index points15.0% of 15.0%10.0% of 10.0%
Index return this period+11.8%+11.8%
Fund return this period+5.9%+8.9%
State todayAt capOpen
Expense ratio0.79%0.74%
Net assets$59m$161m

DDFF in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +9.3% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 2.7% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 6.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 10.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 132 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jan 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

FEBT in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 5.3% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 8.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 131 days remained on Sep 21, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, DDFF or FEBT?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, DDFF can gain about 2.7% before its cap and FEBT about 5.3%, so FEBT has more room left this period.
Which resets first, DDFF or FEBT?
DDFF ends its outcome period on Jan 31, 2027 and FEBT on Jan 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, DDFF or FEBT?
DDFF charges 0.79% a year and FEBT charges 0.74%, so FEBT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DDFF against FEBT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DDFF against FEBT, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ddff-vs-febt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources