Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CJUL vs DDTL: which one stands where?

As of Sep 19, 2026 DDTL can fall 2.1% before its buffer engages and CJUL 2.1%.

Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - Jul.

CJULBetween buffer and cap
15 pts of buffer+11.9% more to the cap−15.0% floor0% period start+14.0% capTODAY · SPY +2.1%15 pts−15.0% floor0% start+14.0% capTODAY · SPY +2.1%
DDTLBetween buffer and cap
10 pts of buffer+2%+13.2% more to the cap−10.0% floor0% period start+15.2% capTODAY · SPY +2.0%10 pts+13.2% to cap−10.0% floor0% start+15.2% capTODAY · SPY +2.0%

These are two different products. DDTL is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. CJUL is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

CJUL resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 285 days from now; DDTL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 285 days. A fall from here reaches CJUL’s buffer after 2.1% and DDTL’s after 2.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

CJUL and DDTL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
CJULDDTLCJULDDTL
3 monthsnot published+2.2%not published−0.1 pts
6 monthsnot published+8.7%not published−9.3 pts
1 yearnot published+9.5%not published−7.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CJUL and DDTL on the same fields, as of Sep 19, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CJUL
Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 14.0%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027
DDTL
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - Jul
Absorbs the first 10% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 15.2%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027
IssuerCorgiInnovator
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer15%10%
Outcome periodJul 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027Jun 30, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027
Days left285285
Starting cap+14.0%+15.2%
Can still gainnot published12.8%
Fall before buffer2.1%2.1%
Protection left, index points15.0% of 15.0%10.0% of 10.0%
Index return this period+2.1%+2.0%
Fund return this period+2.4%+2.0%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.30%0.79%
Net assets$1m$88m

CJUL in plain words

The fund's price can fall 2.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 285 days remained on Sep 19, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

DDTL in plain words

From its price on Sep 19, 2026, the fund can gain about 12.8% more before it reaches its cap. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which resets first, CJUL or DDTL?
CJUL ends its outcome period on Jun 30, 2027 and DDTL on Jun 30, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, CJUL or DDTL?
CJUL charges 0.30% a year and DDTL charges 0.79%, so CJUL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CJUL against DDTL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 19, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CJUL against DDTL, data as of Sep 19, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjul-vs-ddtl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources