Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

AUGP vs JULM: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 AUGP can fall 2.8% before its buffer engages and JULM 1.7%, and JULM resets 15 days sooner.

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August and FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - July.

2.8%AUGP can fall this far before its buffer
1.7%JULM can fall this far before its buffer
12.5%AUGP can still gain
5.5%JULM can still gain
AUGPBetween buffer and cap
12 pts−12.0% floor0% period start+15.7% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%−12.0% floor0% start+15.7% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%
JULMFull floor
full floor beneathfull floor0% period start+7.3% capTODAY · SPY +4.1%full floor beneathfull floor0% start+7.3% capTODAY · SPY +4.1%

These are two different products. JULM is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. AUGP is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

JULM resets first, on Jul 16, 2027, 298 days from now; AUGP runs to Jul 31, 2027, 313 days. AUGP can still gain 12.5% before its cap, JULM 5.5%. A fall from here reaches AUGP’s buffer after 2.8% and JULM’s after 1.7%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

AUGP and JULM over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
AUGPJULMAUGPJULM
3 months+2.9%+1.0%+0.6 pts−1.3 pts
6 months+11.4%+4.2%−6.6 pts−13.9 pts
1 year+12.0%+5.3%−4.6 pts−11.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
AUGP and JULM on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AUGP
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August
Absorbs the first 12% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 15.7%, over a period ending Jul 31, 2027
JULM
FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - July
Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 7.3%, over a period ending Jul 16, 2027
IssuerPGIMFirst Trust
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer12%100%
Outcome periodAug 1, 2026 to Jul 31, 2027Jul 20, 2026 to Jul 16, 2027
Days left313298
Starting cap+15.7%+7.3%
Can still gain12.5%5.5%
Fall before buffer2.8%1.7%
Protection left, index points12.0% of 12.0%100.0% of 100.0%
Index return this period+3.6%+4.1%
Fund return this period+2.4%+0.9%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.50%0.85%
Net assets$31m$34m

AUGP in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 12.5% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 12.0% of the 12.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 313 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jul 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

JULM in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 5.5% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 298 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jul 16, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, AUGP or JULM?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, AUGP can gain about 12.5% before its cap and JULM about 5.5%, so AUGP has more room left this period.
Which resets first, AUGP or JULM?
AUGP ends its outcome period on Jul 31, 2027 and JULM on Jul 16, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, AUGP or JULM?
AUGP charges 0.50% a year and JULM charges 0.85%, so AUGP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AUGP against JULM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AUGP against JULM, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/augp-vs-julm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources