AUGP vs JULM: which one stands where?
As of Oct 2, 2026 AUGP can fall 2.7% before its buffer engages and JULM 1.8%, and JULM resets 15 days sooner. PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August and FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - July.
AUGP costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.5 points; JULM is 1.1 times larger.
| AUGP | JULM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.85% |
| Net assets | $32m | $36m |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.9% | +5.4% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
AUGP: reference +3.0% since period start, fund +2.3%; buffer 0 to −12; cap +15.7%; Between buffer and cap.
JULM: reference +3.5% since period start, fund +1.0%; buffer Floor; cap +7.3%; Full floor.
These are two different products. JULM is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. AUGP is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
JULM resets first, on Jul 16, 2027, 287 days from now; AUGP runs to Jul 31, 2027, 302 days. AUGP can still gain 12.7% before its cap, JULM 5.4%. A fall from here reaches AUGP’s buffer after 2.7% and JULM’s after 1.8%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | AUGP | JULM | AUGP | JULM |
| 3 months | +3.1% | +1.1% | −0.5 pts | −2.5 pts |
| 6 months | +11.1% | +4.2% | −6.8 pts | −13.8 pts |
| 1 year | +11.9% | +5.4% | −4.3 pts | −10.8 pts |
AUGP and JULM over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
AUGP and JULM on the same fields, as of Oct 2, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AUGP in plain words
From its price on Oct 2, 2026, the fund can gain about 12.7% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 12.0% of the 12.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 302 days remained on Oct 2, 2026. On Jul 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
JULM in plain words
From its price on Oct 2, 2026, the fund can gain about 5.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 287 days remained on Oct 2, 2026. On Jul 16, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, AUGP against JULM, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/augp-vs-julm
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AUGP against JULM, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/augp-vs-julm Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. The underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, AUGP against JULM, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/augp-vs-julm
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Oct 2, 2026). AUGP against JULM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/augp-vs-julm
- Markdown
- [AUGP against JULM (ETFIQ, Oct 2, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/augp-vs-julm)