Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

AUGC vs CTAU: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 AUGC can fall 0.5% before its buffer engages and CTAU 0.5%.

Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series and Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series.

ETFIQ Downside Cover Score: CTAU scores higher

If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?

AUGC 38.1CTAU 99.50.2, the lowest in this set99.8, the highest

A percentile among the 293 buffer ETFs with a live outcome period. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All buffer ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

AUGCBetween buffer and cap
10 pts of buffer+17.5% more to the cap−10.0% floor0% period start+18.0% capTODAY · SPY +0.5%−10.0% floor0% start+18.0% capTODAY · SPY +0.5%
CTAUBetween buffer and cap
30 pts of buffer+14.5% more to the cap−30.0% floor0% period start+15.0% capTODAY · SPY +0.5%30 pts of buffer−30.0% floor0% start+15.0% capTODAY · SPY +0.5%

Both are Corgi funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.

Where each one stands today

AUGC resets first, on Jul 31, 2027, 316 days from now; CTAU runs to Jul 31, 2027, 316 days. A fall from here reaches AUGC’s buffer after 0.5% and CTAU’s after 0.5%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
AUGC and CTAU on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AUGC
Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series
Absorbs the first 10% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 18.0%, over a period ending Jul 31, 2027
CTAU
Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series
Absorbs the first 30% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 15.0%, over a period ending Jul 31, 2027
IssuerCorgiCorgi
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer10%30%
Outcome periodAug 1, 2026 to Jul 31, 2027Aug 1, 2026 to Jul 31, 2027
Days left316316
Starting cap+18.0%+15.0%
Can still gainnot publishednot published
Fall before buffer0.5%0.5%
Protection left, index points10.0% of 10.0%30.0% of 30.0%
Index return this period+0.5%+0.5%
Fund return this period+1.2%+0.8%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.30%0.30%
Net assets$1m$1m

AUGC in plain words

The fund's price can fall 0.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 0.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 316 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jul 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

CTAU in plain words

Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which resets first, AUGC or CTAU?
AUGC ends its outcome period on Jul 31, 2027 and CTAU on Jul 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, AUGC or CTAU?
AUGC charges 0.30% a year and CTAU charges 0.30%, so AUGC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AUGC against CTAU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AUGC against CTAU, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/augc-vs-ctau Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources