Data as of .
APOC vs OCTW: which one stands where?
As of Sep 21, 2026 OCTW can fall 9.4% before its buffer engages and APOC 3.3%, and APOC resets 1 days sooner.
These are two different products. APOC is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. OCTW is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
APOC resets first, on Sep 30, 2026, 9 days from now; OCTW runs to Sep 30, 2026, 10 days. APOC can still gain 0.0% before its cap, OCTW 0.1%. A fall from here reaches APOC’s buffer after 3.3% and OCTW’s after 9.4%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Gap to the reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APOC | OCTW | APOC | OCTW | |
| 3 months | +1.3% | +2.5% | −0.9 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 6 months | +2.6% | +9.2% | −15.4 pts | −8.8 pts |
| 1 year | +2.7% | +9.6% | −13.8 pts | −6.9 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +35.3% | not published | −43.1 pts |
| APOC Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Apr/Oct Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 3.4%, over a period ending Sep 30, 2026 | OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 ETF - Oct Absorbs the first 20% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 10.3%, over a period ending Sep 30, 2026 | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Innovator | AllianzIM |
| Reference index | SPY | SPY |
| Buffer | 100% | 20% |
| Outcome period | Mar 31, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026 | Oct 1, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026 |
| Days left | 9 | 10 |
| Starting cap | +3.4% | +10.3% |
| Can still gain | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Fall before buffer | 3.3% | 9.4% |
| Protection left, index points | 100.0% of 100.0% | 20.0% of 20.0% |
| Index return this period | +19.0% | +16.2% |
| Fund return this period | +3.0% | +9.4% |
| State today | At cap | At cap |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.74% |
| Net assets | $70m | $317m |
APOC in plain words
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +3.4% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 0.0% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 3.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 16.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 9 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Sep 30, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.
OCTW in plain words
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +10.3% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 0.1% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 9.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 13.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 20.0% of the 20.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 10 days remained on Sep 21, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which has more room to gain, APOC or OCTW?
- From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, APOC can gain about 0.0% before its cap and OCTW about 0.1%, so OCTW has more room left this period.
- Which resets first, APOC or OCTW?
- APOC ends its outcome period on Sep 30, 2026 and OCTW on Sep 30, 2026. A new cap is set the day after each.
- Which is cheaper, APOC or OCTW?
- APOC charges 0.79% a year and OCTW charges 0.74%, so OCTW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, APOC against OCTW, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/apoc-vs-octw Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.