Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

VWO vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VWO returned +4.8% to XLG's +6.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about VWO and XLG

Net assets: $125.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF, and $11.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

At a glance
+4.8%
VWO total return, 1 year
+6.4%
XLG total return, 1 year
0.06%
VWO expense ratio
0.20%
XLG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VWO costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.6 points.

VWO vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVWOXLG
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.8%+6.4%
Drawdown
Below its high7.0%, high on Sep 4, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion IndexS&P 500 Top 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.06%0.20%
Net assets, VWO as of Sep 30, 2026 and XLG as of Oct 27, 2026$125.4bn$11.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.8%60.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, VWO and XLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first VWO XLG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in VWO
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 15.76%
SLCMT1142 2.96%
Tencent Holdings Ltd 2.82%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 2.11%
MediaTek Inc 1.88%
MKTLIQ 0.95%
Delta Electronics Inc 0.95%
China Construction Bank Corp 0.91%
Only in XLG
NVIDIA Corp 12.54%
Apple Inc 12.04%
Microsoft Corp 9.38%
Amazon.com Inc 5.91%
Alphabet Inc 4.47%
Broadcom Inc 3.87%
Alphabet Inc 3.58%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.25%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Emerging markets Tracks the S&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year +4.8% +6.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −7.3 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.06% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 98.4%
Holdings 6515 53
Net assets, VWO as of Sep 30, 2026 and XLG as of Oct 27, 2026 $125.4bn $11.9bn

VWO and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

XLG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
VWO

VWO tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 6,515 positions, with the top ten at 29.8%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLG

XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VWO or XLG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VWO returned +4.8% and XLG +6.4%.
Which is cheaper, VWO or XLG?
VWO is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VWO and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of VWO and 98% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, VWO against XLG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vwo-vs-xlg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.