Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

VGT vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VGT returned +24.7% to XLG's +6.4%; 50% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about VGT and XLG

Net assets: $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF, and $11.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

At a glance
+24.7%
VGT total return, 1 year
+6.4%
XLG total return, 1 year
0.09%
VGT expense ratio
0.20%
XLG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGT costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.3 points.

VGT vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVGTXLG
Return
Total return, 1 year+24.7%+6.4%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50S&P 500 Top 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.20%
Net assets, VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 and XLG as of Oct 27, 2026$154.5bn$11.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common50%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund63.6%60.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 20, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,118 weekly returns
VGT XLG
Return
Total return edge VGT +2,456.0% +882.5%
Annualized edge VGT +16.3% +11.2%
Price return edge VGT +2,036.1% +572.4%
Risk
Volatility edge XLG 21.3% 17.0%
Max drawdown edge Tie −52.4% −51.7%
Downside capture 99.9% 98.5%
Beta 1.00 0.95
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VGT 0.73 0.61
Sortino edge VGT 1.08 0.87
Treynor 0.201 0.108
Calmar edge VGT 0.31 0.22
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.1% a year +0.5% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.80 0.68
Information ratio 0.19 0.02
Tracking error 0.7% 3.8%

Each against its own benchmark: VGT against FTEC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; XLG against IVV, May 20, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VGT returned more: +2,456.0% to +882.5%. XLG swung less: 17.0% to 21.3%. VGT and XLG fell about the same at their worst: −52.4% and −51.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: VGT vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVGTXLGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+2,456.0%+882.5%VGTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.3%+11.2%VGTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+2,036.1%+572.4%VGTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.3%17.0%XLGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.5%11.8%XLGLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−52.4%−51.7%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture100.0%97.7%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.9%98.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.000.95Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.95Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.730.61VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.080.87VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.2010.108Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.310.22VGTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkFTECIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.1% a year+0.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.800.68Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.2% to +0.5%−1.0% to +2.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.190.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.7%3.8%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,118 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

50%

By the books each fund has filed, VGT and XLG hold 50% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

50% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first VGT XLG
NVIDIA Corp 17.58% 12.54%
Apple Inc 15.91% 12.04%
Microsoft Corp 11.16% 9.38%
Broadcom Inc 4.11% 3.87%
Micron Technology Inc 4.45% 2.49%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.67% 2.17%
Intel Corp 1.98% 1.11%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.55% 1.09%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.60% 1.04%
Applied Materials Inc 1.53% 0.75%
Lam Research Corp 1.55% 0.72%
Texas Instruments Inc 0.98% 0.67%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in VGT
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.24%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 1.02%
Marvell Technology Inc 0.88%
Arista Networks Inc 0.85%
Amphenol Corp 0.80%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.79%
Analog Devices Inc 0.75%
Salesforce Inc 0.72%
Only in XLG
Amazon.com Inc 5.91%
Alphabet Inc 4.47%
Alphabet Inc 3.58%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.25%
Tesla Inc 2.73%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.44%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.40%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.13%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

VGT Vanguard Information Tech ETF XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Information technology Tracks the S&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year +24.7% +6.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +25.0% (FTEC) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −0.3 pts vs FTEC −7.3 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 86.8% 98.4%
Holdings 320 53
Net assets, VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 and XLG as of Oct 27, 2026 $154.5bn $11.9bn

VGT and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-78BAA151E9

VGT and XLG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. VGT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50 and XLG follows S&P 500 Top 50 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 50% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 VGT returned +24.7% and XLG +6.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 18.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

XLG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
VGT

VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLG

XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VGT or XLG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VGT returned +24.7% and XLG +6.4%.
Which is cheaper, VGT or XLG?
VGT is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VGT and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of VGT and 98% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, VGT against XLG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vgt-vs-xlg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.