Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPYM vs XRT: how they differ

SPYM and XRT hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and SPYM returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPYM and XRT hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPYM and XRT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPYMXRT
AMAZON.COM INC3.76%1.50%
WALMART INC0.71%1.24%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP0.61%1.30%
TJX COMPANIES INC0.21%1.07%
ROSS STORES INC0.11%1.38%
O REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC0.11%1.34%
TARGET CORP0.11%1.73%
CARVANA CO0.08%1.48%
SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS0.07%0.20%
AUTOZONE INC0.07%1.31%
EBAY INC0.07%1.40%
KROGER CO0.05%1.25%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPYMOnly in XRT
NVIDIA CORP 8.07%ABERCROMBIE + FITCH CO CL A 2.37%
APPLE INC 7.32%MARINEMAX INC 2.27%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.58%CARMAX INC 1.77%
ALPHABET INC CL A 2.98%FIVE BELOW 1.75%
BROADCOM INC 2.61%PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP INC 1.72%
ALPHABET INC CL C 2.38%SALLY BEAUTY HOLDINGS INC 1.71%
META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 2.16%LITHIA MOTORS INC 1.70%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.68%GROCERY OUTLET HOLDING CORP 1.70%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

SPYM and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPYM
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) ETF
XRT
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetState Street
What it isS&P 500SPDR S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year+17.6%−3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−20.6 pts
Expense ratio1.30%0.35%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%22.5%
Holdings50777

SPYM in plain words

SPYM is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 507 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

XRT in plain words

XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 18.4%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPYM or XRT?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYM returned +17.6% and XRT returned −3.0%, so SPYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPYM or XRT?
SPYM charges 1.30% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so XRT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPYM and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYM and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPYM against XRT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYM against XRT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spym-vs-xrt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources