Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

SPMO vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SPMO returned +18.4% to VONG's +1.1%; 34% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SPMO and VONG

Net assets: $22.3bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF, and $47.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+18.4%
SPMO total return, 1 year
+1.1%
VONG total return, 1 year
0.13%
SPMO expense ratio
0.06%
VONG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VONG costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.3 points.

SPMO vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSPMOVONG
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.4%+1.1%
Drawdown
Below its high10.2%, high on Jun 22, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P 500 Momentum IndexRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.13%0.06%
Net assets, SPMO as of Oct 27, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026$22.3bn$47.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common34%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund50.7%57.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026 · 574 weekly returns
SPMO VONG
Return
Total return edge SPMO +519.8% +429.9%
Annualized edge SPMO (slight) +18.0% +16.3%
Price return edge SPMO +442.9% +378.5%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 19.0% 19.3%
Max drawdown edge SPMO −28.3% −32.5%
Downside capture 93.8% 99.8%
Beta 0.98 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SPMO (slight) 0.84 0.76
Sortino edge SPMO 1.27 1.13
Treynor 0.164 0.151
Calmar edge SPMO 0.63 0.50
Against the benchmark
Alpha +3.8% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.28 0.76
Information ratio 0.36 0.11
Tracking error 9.7% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: SPMO against VOO, Oct 23, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026; VONG against IWF, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SPMO returned more: +519.8% to +429.9%. SPMO and VONG swung about the same: 19.0% and 19.3%. SPMO fell less at its worst: −28.3% to −32.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: SPMO vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSPMOVONGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+519.8%+429.9%SPMOPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.0%+16.3%SPMO (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+442.9%+378.5%SPMOPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.0%19.3%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.6%13.0%SPMO (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−28.3%−32.5%SPMODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture98.9%99.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture93.8%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.980.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.741.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.840.76SPMO (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.271.13SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1640.151Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.630.50SPMOAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIWFThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+3.8% a year+0.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.280.76Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.0% to +9.5%−0.3% to +0.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.360.11Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.7%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 574 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

34%

By the books each fund has filed, SPMO and VONG hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

34% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first SPMO VONG
Apple Inc 9.95% 7.65%
Alphabet Inc 4.76% 5.88%
Alphabet Inc 3.82% 4.75%
Micron Technology Inc 8.80% 3.52%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.48% 2.92%
Lam Research Corp 2.33% 1.21%
Applied Materials Inc 2.28% 1.19%
Caterpillar Inc 1.88% 1.08%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.86% 0.94%
KLA Corp 1.00% 0.75%
Sandisk Corp 2.20% 0.74%
Marvell Technology Inc 1.02% 0.68%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in SPMO
Johnson & Johnson 4.86%
Intel Corp 4.60%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 3.57%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.53%
Merck & Co Inc 2.22%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.83%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.75%
RTX Corp 1.15%
Only in VONG
NVIDIA Corp 15.63%
Microsoft Corp 5.59%
Broadcom Inc 4.79%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.83%
Tesla Inc 3.04%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.71%
Visa Inc 1.69%
Mastercard Inc 1.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Tracks the Russell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year +18.4% +1.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +0.9% (IWF)
Gap to its benchmark +4.7 pts vs VOO +0.2 pts vs IWF
Expense ratio 0.13% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 100.0% 95.5%
Holdings 101 373
Net assets, SPMO as of Oct 27, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026 $22.3bn $47.1bn

SPMO and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-88FE612FF1

SPMO and VONG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. SPMO follows S&P 500 Momentum Index and VONG follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 34% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 SPMO returned +18.4% and VONG +1.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 17.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

SPMO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SPMO

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 50.7%. It sat 10.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VONG

VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPMO or VONG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPMO returned +18.4% and VONG +1.1%.
Which is cheaper, SPMO or VONG?
VONG is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPMO and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPMO and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SPMO against VONG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spmo-vs-vong

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.