Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MUB vs PVAL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MUB returned −0.4% to PVAL's +26.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MUB and PVAL

Net assets: $54.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares National Muni Bond ETF, and $14.1bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF.

At a glance
−0.4%
MUB total return, 1 year
+26.6%
PVAL total return, 1 year
0.05%
MUB expense ratio
0.55%
PVAL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MUB costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 27.0 points.

MUB vs PVAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMUBPVAL
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.4%+26.6%
Benchmark
What it tracksICE AMT-Free US National Municipal IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.05%0.55%
Net assets, MUB as of Oct 27, 2026 and PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026$54.1bn$14.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight91%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and PVAL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MUB PVAL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MUB
UNIVERSITY TEX UNIV REVS 0.16%
SAN ANTONIO TEX WTR REV 0.13%
NEW YORK ST TWY AUTH ST PERS I 0.12%
NORTHWEST TEX INDPT SCH DIST 0.12%
OKLAHOMA TRANSN AUTH OK F/K/A 0.12%
HOUSTON TEX HIGHER ED FIN CORP 0.11%
NEW JERSEY ST 0.11%
OHIO ST UNIV GEN RCPTS 0.11%
Only in PVAL
MICROSOFT CORP 9.27%
APPLE INC 6.70%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.71%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.77%
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (THE) 3.25%
CITIGROUP INC 3.25%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC 3.13%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.95%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of National Muni Bond Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −0.4% +26.6%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +27.5% (IWD)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.9 pts vs IWD
Expense ratio 0.05% 0.55%
Holdings 7873 44
Net assets, MUB as of Oct 27, 2026 and PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026 $54.1bn $14.1bn

MUB and PVAL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MUB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MUB

MUB tracks an index of National Muni Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year.

PVAL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +26.6% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

PVAL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 44 positions, with the top ten at 42.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or PVAL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned −0.4% and PVAL +26.6%.
Which is cheaper, MUB or PVAL?
MUB is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MUB against PVAL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-pval

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.