Which returned more over the last year, LQD or SCHG?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, LQD or SCHG?

LQD charges 0.14% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

LQD vs SCHG: how they differ

LQD and SCHG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SCHG returned more over the year.

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LQD and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in LQD	Only in SCHG
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.88%	NVIDIA Corp 11.02%
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.12%	Apple Inc 9.84%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.11%	Microsoft Corp 7.18%
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING L 144A 0.10%	Amazon.com Inc 5.68%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%	Alphabet Inc 4.76%
BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC 0.08%	Broadcom Inc 4.55%
MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.08%	Tesla Inc 3.92%
CITIGROUP INC (FX-FRN) 0.07%	Alphabet Inc 3.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

LQD and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Schwab
What it is	US investment grade bonds	U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year	−2.7%	+12.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−20.2 pts	−4.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.04%
Holdings	3149	193

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LQD or SCHG?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, LQD or SCHG?: LQD charges 0.14% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LQD against SCHG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LQD against SCHG, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lqd-vs-schg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources