Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IYR vs MTUM: how they differ
IYR and MTUM hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IYR and MTUM hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IYR | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| WELLTOWER | 11.49% | 0.98% |
| EQUINIX REIT | 4.57% | 0.52% |
| VENTAS REIT | 3.32% | 0.23% |
| IRON MOUNTAIN INC | 2.54% | 0.17% |
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.10% | 0.09% |
| USD CASH | 0.12% | 0.07% |
| Only in IYR | Only in MTUM |
|---|---|
| PROLOGIS REIT 8.99% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 5.39% |
| DIGITAL REALTY TRUST REIT 4.86% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.20% |
| SIMON PROPERTY GROUP REIT INC 4.46% | INTEL CORPORATION 4.14% |
| REALTY INCOME REIT 4.19% | CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.48% |
| AMERICAN TOWER REIT 4.16% | JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.38% |
| PUBLIC STORAGE REIT 3.73% | SANDISK 3.10% |
| VIVMARK RESIDENTIAL 3.59% | APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.87% |
| CBRE GROUP CLASS A 3.05% | ALPHABET CLASS A 2.69% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IYR iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF | MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | U.S. Real Estate | MSCI USA Momentum Factor |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.7% | +21.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −12.8 pts | +4.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 80.4% | 98.2% |
| Holdings | 63 | 128 |
IYR in plain words
IYR is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Real Estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 63 positions, with the top ten at 53.4%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
MTUM in plain words
MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 128 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IYR or MTUM?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYR returned +4.7% and MTUM returned +21.8%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IYR or MTUM?
- IYR charges 0.37% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so MTUM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IYR and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 80% of IYR and 98% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYR against MTUM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iyr-vs-mtum Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources