Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWO vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWO returned +7.9% to TLT's −7.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWO and TLT
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $14.0bn for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF and $47.4bn for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
TLT costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.8 points; TLT is 3.4 times larger.
| Measure | IWO | TLT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.9% | −7.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 9.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 2000 Growth Index | ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.24% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $14.0bn | $47.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 6.4% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWO and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWO and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWO
IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
TLT
TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWO or TLT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +7.9% and TLT −7.9%.
- Which is cheaper, IWO or TLT?
- TLT is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWO against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-tlt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWO against TLT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-tlt
[IWO against TLT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-tlt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.