Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWF vs VGLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWF returned +0.9% to VGLT's −6.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWF and VGLT
Net assets: $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, and $10.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF.
Pair scorecard
VGLT costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.6 points; IWF is 12.3 times larger.
| Measure | IWF | VGLT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.9% | −6.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 38.8%, high on Aug 4, 2020 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Growth Index | Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $127.7bn | $10.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 94% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.5% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and VGLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWF and VGLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VGLT
VGLT tracks an index of Long-term Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −6.7% with distributions reinvested, against −6.7% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 38.8% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or VGLT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +0.9% and VGLT −6.7%.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or VGLT?
- VGLT is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWF against VGLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-vglt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWF against VGLT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-vglt
[IWF against VGLT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-vglt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.