Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWF vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWF returned +0.9% to NOBL's +15.5%; 3% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWF and NOBL
Net assets: $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, and $11.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWF costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.6 points; IWF is 10.7 times larger.
| Measure | IWF | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.9% | +15.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Growth Index | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $124.7bn | $11.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 3% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.5% | 17.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and NOBL hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
3% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWF and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
NOBL
NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or NOBL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +0.9% and NOBL +15.5%.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or NOBL?
- IWF is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWF against NOBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-nobl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWF against NOBL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-nobl
[IWF against NOBL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-nobl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.