Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWB vs XLV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWB returned +13.1% to XLV's +25.6%; 9% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWB and XLVNet assets: $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $47.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLV costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.5 points.
| Measure | IWB | XLV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.1% | +25.6% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Index | Health Care Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $48.7bn | $46.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 9% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.3% | 60.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and XLV hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
9% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWB and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.
XLV
XLV tracks an index of Health care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 62 positions, with the top ten at 60.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or XLV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +13.1% and XLV +25.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or XLV?
- XLV is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWB against XLV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-xlv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWB against XLV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-xlv
[IWB against XLV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-xlv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.