Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IGSB vs IWC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IGSB returned +1.3% to IWC's +16.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IGSB and IWC
Net assets: $23.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF, and $1.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Micro-Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
IGSB costs 0.56 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.2 points; IGSB is 19.8 times larger.
| Measure | IGSB | IWC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +1.3% | +16.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 9.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | ICE BofA 1-5 Year US Corporate Index | Russell Microcap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.60% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $23.7bn | $1.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 92% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 5.9% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IGSB and IWC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IGSB and IWC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IGSB
IGSB tracks an index of 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
IWC tracks the Russell Microcap. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,365 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 9.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IGSB or IWC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGSB returned +1.3% and IWC +16.5%.
- Which is cheaper, IGSB or IWC?
- IGSB is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IGSB against IWC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igsb-vs-iwc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IGSB against IWC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igsb-vs-iwc
[IGSB against IWC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igsb-vs-iwc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.