Which returned more over the last year, IBIT or XLE?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBIT returned −31.1% and XLE returned +47.8%, so XLE returned more.

Which is cheaper, IBIT or XLE?

IBIT charges 0.25% a year and XLE charges 0.08%, so XLE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IBIT vs XLE: how they differ

IBIT and XLE hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLE returned more over the year.

iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IBIT and XLE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in IBIT	Only in XLE
BITCOIN 100.00%	EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 23.11%
USD CASH 0.00%	CHEVRON CORP 17.73%
	CONOCOPHILLIPS 6.78%
	MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP 4.83%
	VALERO ENERGY CORP 4.83%
	PHILLIPS 66 4.76%
	WILLIAMS COS INC 4.35%
	SLB LTD 3.87%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

IBIT and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	Holds bitcoin	Tracks an index of Energy
Total return, 1 year	−31.1%	+47.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−47.6 pts	+31.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.08%
Holdings	2	24
Net assets	$63.7bn	$41.3bn

IBIT in plain words

IBIT holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.1% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

XLE in plain words

XLE tracks an index of Energy. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +47.8% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 24 positions, with the top ten at 77.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IBIT or XLE?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBIT returned −31.1% and XLE returned +47.8%, so XLE returned more.
Which is cheaper, IBIT or XLE?: IBIT charges 0.25% a year and XLE charges 0.08%, so XLE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IBIT against XLE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IBIT against XLE, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibit-vs-xle Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources