Which returned more over the last year, IBIT or ONEQ?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBIT returned −31.1% and ONEQ returned +19.2%, so ONEQ returned more.

Which is cheaper, IBIT or ONEQ?

IBIT charges 0.25% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IBIT vs ONEQ: how they differ

IBIT and ONEQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IBIT and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in IBIT	Only in ONEQ
BITCOIN 100.00%	NVIDIA CORP 11.24%
USD CASH 0.00%	APPLE INC 10.04%
	MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%
	AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%
	ALPHABET INC 4.85%
	BROADCOM INC 4.64%
	ALPHABET INC 4.48%
	TESLA INC 3.58%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

IBIT and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	Fidelity
What it is	Holds bitcoin	Tracks the Nasdaq Composite
Total return, 1 year	−31.1%	+19.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−47.6 pts	+2.6 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.21%
Holdings	2	1022
Net assets	$63.7bn	$10.8bn

IBIT in plain words

IBIT holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.1% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IBIT or ONEQ?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBIT returned −31.1% and ONEQ returned +19.2%, so ONEQ returned more.
Which is cheaper, IBIT or ONEQ?: IBIT charges 0.25% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IBIT against ONEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IBIT against ONEQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibit-vs-oneq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources