Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

HDV vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HDV returned +29.4% to XLG's +6.4%; 9% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HDV and XLG

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $15.9bn for iShares Core High Dividend ETF and $11.9bn for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

At a glance
+29.4%
HDV total return, 1 year
+6.4%
XLG total return, 1 year
0.08%
HDV expense ratio
0.20%
XLG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

HDV costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.0 points; HDV is 1.3 times larger.

HDV vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureHDVXLG
Return
Total return, 1 year+29.4%+6.4%
Benchmark
What it tracksMorningstar Dividend Yield Focus IndexS&P 500 Top 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.08%0.20%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$15.9bn$11.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common9%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund55.6%60.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

9%

By the books each fund has filed, HDV and XLG hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

9% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first HDV XLG
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 9.48% 1.76%
ABBVIE 6.77% 1.21%
CHEVRON 7.22% 1.07%
PROCTER & GAMBLE 5.46% 0.89%
COCA-COLA 4.26% 0.84%
HOME DEPOT 4.57% 0.76%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL 5.04% 0.75%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 5.12% 0.44%
PEPSICO 3.89% 0.43%
MCDONALDS CORP 2.55% 0.42%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in HDV
ALTRIA GROUP INC 3.75%
AMGEN INC 2.78%
NEXTERA ENERGY 2.54%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 2.21%
ABBOTT LABORATORIES 2.06%
MEDTRONIC PLC 1.83%
SOUTHERN 1.83%
BLACKSTONE 1.64%
Only in XLG
NVIDIA Corp 12.54%
Apple Inc 12.04%
Microsoft Corp 9.38%
Amazon.com Inc 5.91%
Alphabet Inc 4.47%
Broadcom Inc 3.87%
Alphabet Inc 3.58%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.25%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of High Dividend Tracks the S&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year +29.4% +6.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −7.3 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 89.5% 98.4%
Holdings 77 53
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $15.9bn $11.9bn

HDV and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

HDV and XLG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
HDV

HDV tracks an index of High Dividend. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%.

XLG

XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HDV or XLG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HDV returned +29.4% and XLG +6.4%.
Which is cheaper, HDV or XLG?
HDV is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HDV and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of HDV and 98% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HDV against XLG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hdv-vs-xlg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.