Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
HDV vs IWB: how they differ
HDV and IWB hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and HDV returned more over the year.
iShares Core High Dividend ETF and iShares Russell 1000 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, HDV and IWB hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | HDV | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 8.28% | 0.98% |
| ABBVIE | 6.19% | 0.64% |
| CHEVRON | 6.55% | 0.56% |
| MERCK & CO INC | 4.38% | 0.51% |
| COCA-COLA | 4.05% | 0.49% |
| PROCTER & GAMBLE | 4.42% | 0.48% |
| HOME DEPOT | 4.05% | 0.44% |
| PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC | 4.37% | 0.42% |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC | 5.82% | 0.30% |
| AMGEN INC | 2.66% | 0.29% |
| PEPSICO | 3.35% | 0.27% |
| ABBOTT LABORATORIES | 2.22% | 0.26% |
| Only in HDV | Only in IWB |
|---|---|
| NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP 0.08% | NVIDIA 7.26% |
| TXNM ENERGY INC 0.08% | APPLE 6.73% |
| ERIE INDEMNITY CLASS A 0.07% | MICROSOFT 5.21% |
| ARCHROCK 0.06% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.49% |
| MOELIS CLASS A 0.06% | ALPHABET CLASS A 2.77% |
| MAGNOLIA OIL GAS CORP CLASS A 0.05% | BROADCOM INC 2.40% |
| REYNOLDS CONSUMER PRODUCTS INC 0.02% | ALPHABET CLASS C 2.24% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.02% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Core High Dividend | Russell 1000 |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.5% | +16.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.0 pts | −0.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.0% | 91.9% |
| Holdings | 78 | 945 |
HDV in plain words
HDV is an index equity fund tracking the Core High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 52.8%.
IWB in plain words
IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 945 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HDV or IWB?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HDV returned +22.5% and IWB returned +16.7%, so HDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, HDV or IWB?
- HDV charges 0.08% a year and IWB charges 0.15%, so HDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do HDV and IWB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 98% of HDV and 92% of IWB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HDV against IWB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hdv-vs-iwb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources