Data as of Sep 21, 2026.
FBTC vs XOP: how they differ
FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and XOP a commodity fund, and over the year XOP returned more, +46.7% against −31.0%.
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF.
| FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | XOP State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | State Street |
| What it is | Holds bitcoin | Tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Total return, 1 year | −31.0% | +46.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −47.6 pts | +30.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Holdings | not filed | 54 |
| Net assets | $13.9bn | $4.2bn |
FBTC in plain words
FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
XOP in plain words
XOP tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +46.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 28.7% below its high of Jun 23, 2014 on Sep 18, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or XOP?
- In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and XOP returned +46.7%, so XOP returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FBTC or XOP?
- FBTC charges 0.25% a year and XOP charges 0.35%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against XOP, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-xop Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources