Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or XLV?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and XLV returned +24.6%, so XLV returned more.

Which is cheaper, FBTC or XLV?

FBTC charges 0.25% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so XLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBTC vs XLV: how they differ

FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and XLV an equity index fund, and over the year XLV returned more, +24.6% against −31.0%.

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF.

FBTC and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	Fidelity	State Street
What it is	Holds bitcoin	Tracks an index of Health care
Total return, 1 year	−31.0%	+24.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−47.6 pts	+8.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.08%
Holdings	not filed	64
Net assets	$13.9bn	$43.5bn

FBTC in plain words

FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

XLV in plain words

XLV tracks an index of Health care. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +24.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 64 positions, with the top ten at 60.6%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or XLV?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and XLV returned +24.6%, so XLV returned more.
Which is cheaper, FBTC or XLV?: FBTC charges 0.25% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so XLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBTC against XLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against XLV, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-xlv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources