Data as of Sep 21, 2026.
FBTC vs XLG: how they differ
FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and XLG an equity index fund, and over the year XLG returned more, +11.4% against −31.0%.
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.
| FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Invesco |
| What it is | Holds bitcoin | Tracks the S&P 500 top 50 |
| Total return, 1 year | −31.0% | +11.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −47.6 pts | −5.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.20% |
| Holdings | not filed | 53 |
| Net assets | $13.9bn | $11.6bn |
FBTC in plain words
FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
XLG in plain words
XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +11.4% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 19, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 60.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or XLG?
- In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and XLG returned +11.4%, so XLG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FBTC or XLG?
- FBTC charges 0.25% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so XLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against XLG, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-xlg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources