Data as of Sep 21, 2026.
FBTC vs MINT: how they differ
FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and MINT an actively managed short-term fund, and over the year MINT returned more, +4.3% against −31.0%.
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.
| FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | PIMCO |
| What it is | Holds bitcoin | Actively managed |
| Total return, 1 year | −31.0% | +4.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −47.6 pts | −12.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.36% |
| Holdings | not filed | 977 |
| Net assets | $13.9bn | $16.4bn |
FBTC in plain words
FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
MINT in plain words
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +4.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or MINT?
- In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and MINT returned +4.3%, so MINT returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FBTC or MINT?
- FBTC charges 0.25% a year and MINT charges 0.36%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against MINT, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-mint Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources