Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or MAGS?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and MAGS returned +11.2%, so MAGS returned more.

Which is cheaper, FBTC or MAGS?

FBTC charges 0.25% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBTC vs MAGS: how they differ

FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and MAGS an actively managed equity fund, and over the year MAGS returned more, +11.2% against −31.0%.

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

FBTC and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	Fidelity	Roundhill
What it is	Holds bitcoin	Actively managed
Total return, 1 year	−31.0%	+11.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−47.6 pts	−5.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.30%
Holdings	not filed	9
Net assets	$13.9bn	$4.7bn

FBTC in plain words

FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +11.2% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or MAGS?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and MAGS returned +11.2%, so MAGS returned more.
Which is cheaper, FBTC or MAGS?: FBTC charges 0.25% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBTC against MAGS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against MAGS, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-mags Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources