Data as of Sep 21, 2026.
FBTC vs LQD: how they differ
FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and LQD a bond index fund, and over the year LQD returned more, −2.0% against −31.0%.
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.
| FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | Holds bitcoin | Tracks an index of US investment grade bonds |
| Total return, 1 year | −31.0% | −2.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −47.6 pts | −18.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.14% |
| Holdings | not filed | 3172 |
| Net assets | $13.9bn | $27.5bn |
FBTC in plain words
FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
LQD in plain words
LQD tracks an index of US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.1% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 18, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or LQD?
- In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and LQD returned −2.0%, so LQD returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FBTC or LQD?
- FBTC charges 0.25% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against LQD, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-lqd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources