Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or IGM?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and IGM returned +30.9%, so IGM returned more.

Which is cheaper, FBTC or IGM?

FBTC charges 0.25% a year and IGM charges 0.37%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBTC vs IGM: how they differ

FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and IGM an equity index fund, and over the year IGM returned more, +30.9% against −31.0%.

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF.

FBTC and IGM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	Fidelity	iShares
What it is	Holds bitcoin	Tracks an index of Expanded Tech Sector
Total return, 1 year	−31.0%	+30.9%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−47.6 pts	+14.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.37%
Holdings	not filed	300
Net assets	$13.9bn	$11.0bn

FBTC in plain words

FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

IGM in plain words

IGM tracks an index of Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +30.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 300 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or IGM?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and IGM returned +30.9%, so IGM returned more.
Which is cheaper, FBTC or IGM?: FBTC charges 0.25% a year and IGM charges 0.37%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBTC against IGM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against IGM, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-igm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources