Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBTC vs IAU: how they differ

FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and IAU a commodity fund, and over the year IAU returned more, +19.7% against −31.0%.

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and iShares Gold Trust.

FBTC and IAU on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
Where it sitsCore fundCore fund
IssuerFidelityiShares
What it isHolds bitcoinHolds gold
Total return, 1 year−31.0%+19.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+16.6%+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500−47.6 pts+3.1 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.25%
Net assets$13.9bn$64.9bn

FBTC in plain words

FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

IAU in plain words

IAU holds gold. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +19.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 19.0% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or IAU?
In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and IAU returned +19.7%, so IAU returned more.
Which is cheaper, FBTC or IAU?
FBTC charges 0.25% a year and IAU charges 0.25%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBTC against IAU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against IAU, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-iau Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources