Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWY vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWY returned +79.7% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWY and PDBC

Net assets: $24.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF, and $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWY expense ratio
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.59% a year; their one-year returns differ by 24.1 points; EWY is 2.8 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

EWY vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYPDBC
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%+55.6%
Drawdown
Below its high24.3%, high on Jun 18, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$22.5bn$8.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWY PDBC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14%
SK HYNIX 23.11%
SK SQUARE 2.78%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39%
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI South Korea Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +79.7% +55.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) +54.6% (DBC)
Gap to its benchmark +63.4 pts vs EEM +1.0 pts vs DBC
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.59%
Holdings 78 1
Net assets, EWY as of Oct 28, 2026 and PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 $24.4bn $8.0bn

EWY and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWY and PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or PDBC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +79.7% and PDBC +55.6%.
Which is cheaper, EWY or PDBC?
Neither: EWY and PDBC both charge 0.59% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWY against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-pdbc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.