Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EWT vs XLC: how they differ
EWT and XLC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EWT and XLC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EWT | Only in XLC |
|---|---|
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.07% | META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 18.92% |
| MEDIATEK 7.03% | ALPHABET INC CL A 10.12% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.53% | ALPHABET INC CL C 8.10% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.28% | AT+T INC 5.19% |
| ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.79% | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 5.03% |
| UNITED MICRO ELECTRONICS CORP 2.09% | WALT DISNEY CO/THE 4.76% |
| ELITE MATERIAL 2.08% | WARNER BROS DISCOVERY INC 4.61% |
| NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.04% | COMCAST CORP CLASS A 4.61% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | XLC State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | MSCI Taiwan | Communication services |
| Total return, 1 year | +84.9% | −2.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +67.4 pts | −19.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 78 | 26 |
EWT in plain words
EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 48.6%.
XLC in plain words
XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 26 positions, with the top ten at 70.4%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EWT or XLC?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and XLC returned −2.0%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EWT or XLC?
- EWT charges 0.59% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so XLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EWT and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWT and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWT against XLC, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-xlc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources