Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or MGK?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and MGK returned +14.6%, so MGK returned more.

Which is cheaper, ETHA or MGK?

ETHA charges 0.25% a year and MGK charges 0.07%, so MGK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ETHA vs MGK: how they differ

ETHA and MGK hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MGK returned more over the year.

iShares Ethereum Trust ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ETHA and MGK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ETHA and MGK both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding	ETHA	MGK
USD CASH	0.00%	0.01%

Only in each
Only in ETHA	Only in MGK
ETHER 100.00%	NVIDIA Corp 14.32%
	Apple Inc 13.04%
	Microsoft Corp 9.99%
	Alphabet Inc 5.50%
	Amazon.com Inc 4.76%
	Alphabet Inc 4.33%
	Broadcom Inc 4.10%
	Meta Platforms Inc 4.05%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

ETHA and MGK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	MGK Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	Holds ether	Tracks an index of Mega Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year	−42.6%	+14.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−59.2 pts	−2.0 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.07%
Holdings	2	59
Net assets	$9.2bn	$33.5bn

ETHA in plain words

ETHA holds ether. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −42.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 45.6% below its high of Aug 22, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

MGK in plain words

MGK tracks an index of Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +14.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 59 positions, with the top ten at 66.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or MGK?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and MGK returned +14.6%, so MGK returned more.
Which is cheaper, ETHA or MGK?: ETHA charges 0.25% a year and MGK charges 0.07%, so MGK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ETHA against MGK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ETHA against MGK, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/etha-vs-mgk Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources