Data as of Sep 19, 2026.
ETHA vs FBTC: how they differ
ETHA and FBTC are both spot crypto ETPs, and over the year FBTC returned more, −31.0% against −42.6%.
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund.
| ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | Holds ether | Holds bitcoin |
| Total return, 1 year | −42.6% | −31.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −59.2 pts | −47.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 2 | not filed |
| Net assets | $9.2bn | $13.9bn |
ETHA in plain words
ETHA holds ether. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −42.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 45.6% below its high of Aug 22, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
FBTC in plain words
FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or FBTC?
- In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and FBTC returned −31.0%, so FBTC returned more.
- Which is cheaper, ETHA or FBTC?
- ETHA charges 0.25% a year and FBTC charges 0.25%, so ETHA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ETHA against FBTC, data as of Sep 19, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/etha-vs-fbtc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources