Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EEM vs XLV: how they differ
EEM and XLV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EEM returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EEM and XLV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EEM | Only in XLV |
|---|---|
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 15.18% | ELI LILLY + CO 14.87% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 7.46% | JOHNSON + JOHNSON 10.73% |
| SK HYNIX 6.07% | ABBVIE INC 7.54% |
| TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.65% | MERCK + CO. INC. 5.98% |
| ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.82% | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 5.90% |
| MEDIATEK 1.71% | THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC 3.75% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.97% | AMGEN INC 3.46% |
| CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.83% | ABBOTT LABORATORIES 3.01% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | XLV State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | Emerging markets | Health care |
| Total return, 1 year | +32.3% | +20.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +14.8 pts | +2.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 965 | 63 |
EEM in plain words
EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 965 positions, with the top ten at 38.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLV in plain words
XLV is an index equity fund tracking the Health care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 63 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EEM or XLV?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and XLV returned +20.4%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EEM or XLV?
- EEM charges 0.72% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so XLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EEM and XLV overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EEM and 100% of XLV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EEM against XLV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-xlv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources