Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EDV vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EDV returned −13.3% to IWF's +0.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EDV and IWF

Net assets: $3.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF, and $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
−13.3%
EDV total return, 1 year
+0.9%
IWF total return, 1 year
0.05%
EDV expense ratio
0.18%
IWF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EDV costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.2 points; IWF is far larger, $127.7bn against $3.6bn.

EDV vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEDVIWF
Return
Total return, 1 year−13.3%+0.9%
Drawdown
Below its high57.0%, high on Mar 9, 20204.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2030 Year Equal Par Bond IndexRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.05%0.18%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$3.6bn$127.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight94%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EDV and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EDV IWF
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EDV
United States Treasury Strip Principal 1.91%
United States Treasury Strip Principal 1.84%
United States Treasury Strip Principal 1.73%
United States Treasury Strip Coupon 1.62%
United States Treasury Strip Coupon 1.62%
United States Treasury Strip Coupon 1.61%
United States Treasury Strip Coupon 1.60%
United States Treasury Strip Coupon 1.59%
Only in IWF
NVIDIA 15.30%
APPLE 8.18%
MICROSOFT 5.94%
ALPHABET CLASS A 5.62%
BROADCOM INC 4.79%
ALPHABET CLASS C 4.53%
TESLA INC 3.58%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EDV Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Extended Duration Treasury Tracks the Russell 1000 growth
Total return, 1 year −13.3% +0.9%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +1.1% (VONG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.2 pts vs VONG
Expense ratio 0.05% 0.18%
Holdings 81 374
Net assets, EDV as of Sep 30, 2026 and IWF as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.6bn $124.7bn

EDV and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EDV

EDV tracks an index of Extended Duration Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −13.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 57.0% below its high of Mar 9, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWF

IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EDV or IWF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EDV returned −13.3% and IWF +0.9%.
Which is cheaper, EDV or IWF?
EDV is cheaper, by 0.13 percentage points a year. That is about $13 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EDV against IWF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/edv-vs-iwf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.