Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs EWT: how they differ
DYNF and EWT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and EWT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | EWT |
|---|---|---|
| USD CASH | 0.13% | 0.13% |
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.06% | 0.07% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in EWT |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 8.13% | TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.07% |
| APPLE 7.62% | MEDIATEK 7.03% |
| MICROSOFT 4.75% | DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.53% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.09% | HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.28% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.46% | ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.79% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.73% | UNITED MICRO ELECTRONICS CORP 2.09% |
| BROADCOM INC 2.59% | ELITE MATERIAL 2.08% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.42% | NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.04% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | MSCI Taiwan |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +84.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | +67.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.59% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 234 | 78 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 234 positions, with the top ten at 40.3%.
EWT in plain words
EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 48.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or EWT?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and EWT returned +84.9%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or EWT?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and EWT charges 0.59%, so DYNF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and EWT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 0% of EWT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against EWT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-ewt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources