Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or FBTC?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +5.7% and FBTC returned −31.0%, so CGGR returned more.

Which is cheaper, CGGR or FBTC?

CGGR charges 0.39% a year and FBTC charges 0.25%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGGR vs FBTC: how they differ

CGGR is an actively managed equity fund and FBTC a spot crypto ETP, and over the year CGGR returned more, +5.7% against −31.0%.

Capital Group Growth ETF and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund.

CGGR and FBTC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF	FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	Capital Group	Fidelity
What it is	Actively managed	Holds bitcoin
Total return, 1 year	+5.7%	−31.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−10.9 pts	−47.6 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.25%
Holdings	89	not filed
Net assets	$25.6bn	$13.9bn

CGGR in plain words

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +5.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.

FBTC in plain words

FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or FBTC?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +5.7% and FBTC returned −31.0%, so CGGR returned more.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or FBTC?: CGGR charges 0.39% a year and FBTC charges 0.25%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGGR against FBTC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against FBTC, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-fbtc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources