Which returned more over the last year, BTRN or TLT?

In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BTRN returned −13.9% and TLT returned −4.7%, so TLT returned more.

Which is cheaper, BTRN or TLT?

BTRN charges 0.95% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so TLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are BTRN and TLT the same kind of fund?

No. BTRN is an alternatives ETF and TLT is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 19, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BTRN vs TLT: how they differ

Over the year TLT returned more, −4.7% to BTRN's −13.9%, and TLT charges 0.15% to BTRN's 0.95%.

Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

BTRN and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 19, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Alternatives ETF	Core fund
Issuer	Global X	iShares
What it is	Managed futures	Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year	−13.9%	−4.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−30.5 pts	−21.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.95%	0.15%
Holdings	not filed	49
Net assets	$2m	$46.7bn

BTRN in plain words

BTRN is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.21 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.31, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.31% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks BTRN fell 0.64% on average, a down-week capture of 51.2%. Over the same 52 weeks BTRN returned −12.2% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 15.8 percentage points behind cash.

TLT in plain words

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −4.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BTRN or TLT?: In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BTRN returned −13.9% and TLT returned −4.7%, so TLT returned more.
Which is cheaper, BTRN or TLT?: BTRN charges 0.95% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so TLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are BTRN and TLT the same kind of fund?: No. BTRN is an alternatives ETF and TLT is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BTRN against TLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 19, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BTRN against TLT, data as of Sep 19, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/btrn-vs-tlt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources