Which returned more over the last year, BSV or PFF?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and PFF returned −0.8%, so BSV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BSV or PFF?

BSV charges 0.03% a year and PFF charges 0.45%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs PFF: how they differ

BSV and PFF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and BSV returned more over the year.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and PFF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BSV	Only in PFF
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.13%	BOEING CO 3.54%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.90%	ORACLE CORPORATION 2.31%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.89%	SUPER MICRO COMPUTER INC 2.30%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.82%	ALPHABET INC 2.24%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CONV PR 2.06%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	ALBEMARLE CORP 1.12%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.80%	MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED 0.89%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%	BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES UNITS 0.74%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

BSV and PFF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund	PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	iShares
What it is	Short-Term Bond	Preferred and Income Securities
Total return, 1 year	+1.1%	−0.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−16.4 pts	−18.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.45%
Holdings	3185	461

BSV in plain words

BSV is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

PFF in plain words

PFF is an index equity fund tracking the Preferred and Income Securities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 23.1%. It sat 3.2% below its high of May 8, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or PFF?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and PFF returned −0.8%, so BSV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BSV or PFF?: BSV charges 0.03% a year and PFF charges 0.45%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against PFF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against PFF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-pff Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources