Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
ASGM vs BND: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ASGM returned +22.8% to BND's +0.2%, and BND charges 0.03% to ASGM's 0.86%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ASGM and BND
Net assets: $8.5m on Jul 31, 2026 for Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF, and $167.4bn on Oct 31, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF.
Pair scorecard
BND costs 0.83 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.6 points.
| Measure | ASGM | BND |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +22.8% | +0.2% |
| Total return, 52 weeks | +21.9% | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | not published | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index |
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
| Against cash | 18.2 points ahead | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.86% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, ASGM as of Jul 31, 2026 and BND as of Oct 31, 2026 | $8.5m | $167.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Risk | ||
| Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns | +0.85 | |
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +1.08: about 1.08% for each 1% | |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | fell 1.25% | |
| Down-week capture | 116.3% | |
| Weeks the S&P 500 fell | 26 of 52, by 1.07% on average | |
Side by side
ASGM and BND on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ASGM
ASGM is a global macro fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.85 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +1.08, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 1.08% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks ASGM fell 1.25% on average, a down-week capture of 116.3%. Over the same 52 weeks ASGM returned +21.9% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 18.2 percentage points ahead of cash.
BND
BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +0.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
Questions people ask
- Are ASGM and BND in the same category?
- ASGM is an alternatives ETF and BND is a bond ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, ASGM or BND?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ASGM returned +22.8% and BND +0.2%.
- Which is cheaper, ASGM or BND?
- BND is cheaper, by 0.83 percentage points a year. That is about $83 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ASGM against BND, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/asgm-vs-bnd
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). ASGM against BND. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/asgm-vs-bnd
[ASGM against BND (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/asgm-vs-bnd)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.