Which returned more over the last year, ASGM or BND?

In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ASGM returned +28.4% and BND returned −0.4%, so ASGM returned more.

Which is cheaper, ASGM or BND?

ASGM charges 0.86% a year and BND charges 0.03%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are ASGM and BND the same kind of fund?

No. ASGM is an alternatives ETF and BND is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 19, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ASGM vs BND: how they differ

Over the year ASGM returned more, +28.4% to BND's −0.4%, and BND charges 0.03% to ASGM's 0.86%.

Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF.

ASGM and BND on the fields both publish, as of Sep 19, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF	BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
Where it sits	Alternatives ETF	Core fund
Issuer	Virtus	Vanguard
What it is	Global macro	Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds
Total return, 1 year	+28.4%	−0.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	+11.8 pts	−17.0 pts
Expense ratio	0.86%	0.03%
Holdings	not filed	16296
Net assets	$8m	$163.3bn

ASGM in plain words

ASGM is a global macro fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.81 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.86, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.86% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks ASGM fell 0.80% on average, a down-week capture of 64.2%. Over the same 52 weeks ASGM returned +28.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 24.6 percentage points ahead of cash.

BND in plain words

BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ASGM or BND?: In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ASGM returned +28.4% and BND returned −0.4%, so ASGM returned more.
Which is cheaper, ASGM or BND?: ASGM charges 0.86% a year and BND charges 0.03%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are ASGM and BND the same kind of fund?: No. ASGM is an alternatives ETF and BND is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ASGM against BND, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 19, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ASGM against BND, data as of Sep 19, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/asgm-vs-bnd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources