Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

XLP vs XRT: how they differ

XLP and XRT hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and XLP returned more over the year.

State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, XLP and XRT hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions XLP and XRT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingXLPXRT
Dollar Tree Inc1.43%1.48%
Dollar General Corp1.65%1.42%
Target Corp3.87%1.38%
Costco Wholesale Corp9.06%1.29%
Walmart Inc10.84%1.27%
Casey's General Stores Inc1.91%1.17%
Kroger Co/The2.05%1.17%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in XLPOnly in XRT
Procter & Gamble Co/The 7.46%Groupon Inc 1.78%
Coca-Cola Co/The 6.87%RealReal Inc/The 1.75%
Philip Morris International Inc 6.16%Bath & Body Works Inc 1.73%
Colgate-Palmolive Co 4.71%Warby Parker Inc 1.64%
Altria Group Inc 4.55%Upbound Group Inc 1.59%
Monster Beverage Corp 4.47%Coupang Inc 1.55%
PepsiCo Inc 4.34%Maplebear Inc 1.55%
Mondelez International Inc 4.17%Revolve Group Inc 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

XLP and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
XLP
State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
XRT
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetState Street
What it isConsumer staplesSPDR S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year+6.3%−3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−11.2 pts−20.6 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.35%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%22.5%
Holdings3475

XLP in plain words

XLP is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 34 positions, with the top ten at 62.6%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XRT in plain words

XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, XLP or XRT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, XLP returned +6.3% and XRT returned −3.0%, so XLP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, XLP or XRT?
XLP charges 0.08% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so XLP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do XLP and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of XLP and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

XLP against XRT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, XLP against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/XLP-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources