Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VXF vs VYM: how they differ

VXF and VYM hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and VYM returned more over the year.

Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VXF and VYM hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VXF and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVXFVYM
Ferguson Enterprises Inc0.54%0.21%
Royalty Pharma PLC0.26%0.08%
Reliance Inc0.22%0.08%
Ovintiv Inc0.17%0.07%
East West Bancorp Inc0.21%0.07%
Watsco Inc0.17%0.06%
DT Midstream Inc0.18%0.06%
Pinnacle Financial Partners Inc0.18%0.06%
Prc Newco Inc0.17%0.06%
SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc0.15%0.06%
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc0.18%0.06%
Reinsurance Group of America Inc0.16%0.06%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VXFOnly in VYM
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 1.19%Broadcom Inc 8.07%
Snowflake Inc 1.03%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%
Bloom Energy Corp 0.93%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73%
Cloudflare Inc 0.92%Johnson & Johnson 2.31%
Astera Labs Inc 0.76%Caterpillar Inc 1.73%
Rocket Lab Corp 0.61%AbbVie Inc 1.57%
Cheniere Energy Inc 0.59%Cisco Systems Inc 1.52%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.52%Chevron Corp 1.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VXF and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isExtended MarketUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+14.1%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.4 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.04%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%92.2%
Holdings3365608

VXF in plain words

VXF is an index equity fund tracking the Extended Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3365 positions, with the top ten at 7.6%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VXF or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VXF returned +14.1% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VXF or VYM?
VXF charges 0.05% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VXF and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of VXF and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VXF against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VXF against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VXF-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources