Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
VTWO vs XRT: how they differ
VTWO and XRT hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and VTWO returned more over the year.
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VTWO and XRT hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | VTWO | XRT |
|---|---|---|
| Boot Barn Holdings Inc | 0.15% | 1.34% |
| Urban Outfitters Inc | 0.14% | 1.32% |
| PriceSmart Inc | 0.13% | 1.51% |
| Victoria's Secret & Co | 0.11% | 1.52% |
| Group 1 Automotive Inc | 0.11% | 1.21% |
| Asbury Automotive Group Inc | 0.11% | 1.37% |
| Advance Auto Parts Inc | 0.11% | 1.42% |
| Abercrombie & Fitch Co | 0.10% | 1.43% |
| Academy Sports & Outdoors Inc | 0.10% | 1.28% |
| American Eagle Outfitters Inc | 0.07% | 1.33% |
| Warby Parker Inc | 0.07% | 1.64% |
| Kohl's Corp | 0.05% | 1.51% |
| Only in VTWO | Only in XRT |
|---|---|
| Bloom Energy Corp 1.83% | Bath & Body Works Inc 1.73% |
| Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.12% | Coupang Inc 1.55% |
| Sterling Infrastructure Inc 0.76% | Maplebear Inc 1.55% |
| Fabrinet 0.69% | Dollar Tree Inc 1.48% |
| Nextpower Inc 0.67% | Etsy Inc 1.48% |
| IonQ Inc 0.63% | CarMax Inc 1.48% |
| Coeur Mining Inc 0.58% | Valvoline Inc 1.47% |
| TTM Technologies Inc 0.52% | Dick's Sporting Goods Inc 1.43% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund | XRT State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | State Street |
| What it is | Russell 2000 | SPDR S&P Retail |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.4% | −3.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.9 pts | −20.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.5% | 22.5% |
| Holdings | 1951 | 75 |
VTWO in plain words
VTWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1951 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XRT in plain words
XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VTWO or XRT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VTWO returned +21.4% and XRT returned −3.0%, so VTWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, VTWO or XRT?
- VTWO charges 0.07% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so VTWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do VTWO and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of VTWO and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, VTWO against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VTWO-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources