Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VTI vs XME: how they differ

Over the year XME returned more, +32.5% against +17.2%, and VTI charges 0.03% against 0.35%.

Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Metals & Mining ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VTI and XME hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VTI and XME both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVTIXME
Newmont Corp0.14%4.24%
Freeport-McMoRan Inc0.12%4.26%
Nucor Corp0.07%3.74%
Steel Dynamics Inc0.04%3.60%
Reliance Inc0.03%3.99%
Royal Gold Inc0.02%4.26%
Coeur Mining Inc0.02%4.46%
Alcoa Corp0.02%3.35%
Hecla Mining Co0.01%4.62%
MP Materials Corp0.01%4.41%
Commercial Metals Co0.01%3.59%
Materion Corp0.01%4.22%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VTIOnly in XME
NVIDIA Corp 6.37%McEwen Inc 1.34%
Apple Inc 5.88%
Microsoft Corp 3.84%
Amazon.com Inc 3.19%
Alphabet Inc 2.90%
Broadcom Inc 2.48%
Alphabet Inc 2.29%
Micron Technology Inc 1.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

VTI and XME on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
XME
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Metals & Mining ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundThematic ETF
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isUS total marketMiners and metals
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+32.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts+15.0 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50088.3%17.3%
Holdings353141

VTI in plain words

VTI is an index equity fund tracking the US total market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

XME in plain words

By weight, 17% of XME's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +32.5% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 15.0 pts. It sits 14.4% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VTI or XME?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VTI returned +17.2% and XME returned +32.5%, so XME returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VTI or XME?
VTI charges 0.03% a year and XME charges 0.35%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VTI and XME overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of VTI and 17% of XME by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are VTI and XME the same kind of fund?
No. VTI is an index ETF and XME is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VTI against XME, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VTI against XME, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VTI-XME Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources