Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SCHG vs XME: how they differ
Over the year XME returned more, +32.5% against +12.7%, and SCHG charges 0.04% against 0.35%.
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Metals & Mining ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and XME hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in SCHG | Only in XME |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 11.02% | Uranium Energy Corp 4.76% |
| Apple Inc 9.84% | Hecla Mining Co 4.62% |
| Microsoft Corp 7.18% | Centrus Energy Corp 4.60% |
| Amazon.com Inc 5.68% | USA Rare Earth Inc 4.47% |
| Alphabet Inc 4.76% | Coeur Mining Inc 4.46% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.55% | MP Materials Corp 4.41% |
| Tesla Inc 3.92% | Freeport-McMoRan Inc 4.26% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.78% | Royal Gold Inc 4.26% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | XME State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Metals & Mining ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Thematic ETF |
| Issuer | Schwab | State Street |
| What it is | U.S. Large-Cap Growth | Miners and metals |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.7% | +32.5% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −4.8 pts | +15.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.4% | 17.3% |
| Holdings | 193 | 41 |
SCHG in plain words
SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
XME in plain words
By weight, 17% of XME's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +32.5% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 15.0 pts. It sits 14.4% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or XME?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +12.7% and XME returned +32.5%, so XME returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SCHG or XME?
- SCHG charges 0.04% a year and XME charges 0.35%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SCHG and XME overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHG and 17% of XME by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are SCHG and XME the same kind of fund?
- No. SCHG is an index ETF and XME is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHG against XME, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHG-XME Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources