Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VT vs XLF: how they differ

VT and XLF hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and VT returned more over the year.

Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VT and XLF hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VT and XLF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVTXLF
JPMorgan Chase & Co0.72%11.57%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc0.69%12.10%
Visa Inc0.50%7.51%
Mastercard Inc0.36%5.47%
Bank of America Corp0.31%4.91%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The0.23%3.94%
Wells Fargo & Co0.23%3.34%
Morgan Stanley0.20%3.31%
Citigroup Inc0.19%3.15%
American Express Co0.16%2.38%
BlackRock Funding Inc/DE0.15%1.83%
Charles Schwab Corp/The0.14%1.99%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VTOnly in XLF
NVIDIA Corp 4.22%Chubb Ltd 1.62%
Apple Inc 3.53%Aon PLC 0.94%
Microsoft Corp 2.73%Arch Capital Group Ltd 0.45%
Amazon.com Inc 2.29%Willis Towers Watson PLC 0.33%
Alphabet Inc 2.04%Everest Group Ltd 0.19%
Broadcom Inc 1.74%Invesco Ltd 0.15%
Alphabet Inc 1.61%Erie Indemnity Co 0.08%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VT and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
XLF
State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isTotal World StockFinancials
Total return, 1 year+18.9%+7.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.4 pts−9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50055.2%100.0%
Holdings1004276

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

XLF in plain words

XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VT or XLF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VT returned +18.9% and XLF returned +7.6%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VT or XLF?
VT charges 0.06% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VT and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 55% of VT and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VT against XLF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VT against XLF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VT-XLF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources