Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VT vs VXUS: how they differ

VT and VXUS hold 36% of their weight in the same names, and VXUS returned more over the year.

Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund and Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VT and VXUS hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VT and VXUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVTVXUS
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt1.52%3.97%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd0.64%1.67%
ASML Holding NV0.51%1.32%
SK hynix Inc0.44%1.14%
Tencent Holdings Ltd0.34%0.89%
HSBC Holdings PLC0.28%0.74%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd0.27%0.69%
AstraZeneca PLC0.26%0.67%
Novartis AG0.26%0.67%
Nestle SA0.23%0.61%
Shell PLC0.23%0.61%
Royal Bank of Canada0.23%0.59%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VTOnly in VXUS
NVIDIA Corp 4.22%Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF 0.12%
Apple Inc 3.53%National Storage REIT 0.01%
Microsoft Corp 2.73%Cemex SAB de CV 0.00%
Amazon.com Inc 2.29%Keyera Corp 0.00%
Alphabet Inc 2.04%263 Network Communications Co Ltd 0.00%
Broadcom Inc 1.74%ABA Chemicals Corp 0.00%
Alphabet Inc 1.61%AUCMA Co Ltd 0.00%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.21%Anhui Guofeng New Materials Co Ltd 0.00%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

VT and VXUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isTotal World StockTotal International Stock
Total return, 1 year+18.9%+22.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.4 pts+4.8 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50055.2%0.0%
Holdings100428775

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

VXUS in plain words

VXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8775 positions, with the top ten at 12.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VT or VXUS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VT returned +18.9% and VXUS returned +22.3%, so VXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VT or VXUS?
VT charges 0.06% a year and VXUS charges 0.05%, so VXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VT and VXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 55% of VT and 0% of VXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 36% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VT against VXUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VT against VXUS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VT-VXUS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources